Legal Opinion

Fortes v. Ramos, 96-5663 (2001)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 19, 2001No. C.A. No. 96-5663Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. After hearing on the motions, this justice took the matter under advisement.

This medical malpractice action arises out of the death of a fetus that died in utero due to a prolapsed cord. The plaintiffs, Donna and Antonio Fortes (Fortes) allege that the physicians were negligent when they failed to diagnose Donna Fortes's incompetent cervix and to perform a cerclage procedure that plaintiffs contend would have prevented the fetus' premature delivery and death. This was Donna Fortes's third fetus to die in utero. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Battalla v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API