Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 26, 1998No. 39607-2-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

— James Bailey appeals a judgment entered against him that apportions twenty percent fault for James Bullard’s damages in a fraudulently settled lawsuit. Bailey associated himself with Richard McClellan, who represented himself to Bullard as an attorney, then settled Bullard’s personal injury claim for $40,000 and stole these funds. The trial court found Bailey committed legal malpractice in negligently supervising McClellan and negligently representing Bullard, and that Bailey’s negligence was a proximate cause of Bullard’s damages. Bailey appeals, arguing the independent business judgment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hetzel v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Tigman v. Accident & Medical InvestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Bullard v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Rubin Resources v. Garold "Gary" W. Morris, IIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. MeekinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API