Legal Opinion

In Re Maher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 1, 1974No. 88-73PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

The appellant, a nonprobationary employee of the State Highway Department, brought this action under the grievance procedure governing employees of the State of Vermont pursuant to 3 V.S.A. § 901, et seq.

On April 19, 1971, the grievant was placed on a 30-day warning period on the basis of his performance evaluation report which indicated a marginal performance. At the end of that period, appellant’s performance evaluation report showed an overall rating of unsatisfactory. As a consequence, the grievant’s employment was terminated with two weeks salary paid to him in lieu of notice.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Varnum v. VarnumSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Audette v. GreerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. Pezzano v. BonneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Derosia v. Book Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. In Re RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API