Legal Opinion

State v. Ard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1994No. 18682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Following nonjury trial defendant was convicted of tampering with a witness in violation of § 575.270.1, RSMo 1986. She was sentenced to 90 days in the county jail. On appeal defendant presents two points relied on. Her first point states:

“The trial court erred when it overruled appellant’s motions for directed verdict at the close of the state’s case and at the close of all the evidence because the information was defective in that it failed to sufficiently allege facts constituting the crime charged, adequately inform appellant of the charges upon which she was tried, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. ToddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API