Legal Opinion

Wayman v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1966No. 39343PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The determinative issue raised by this action is whether a board of education may be enjoined from maintaining a nuisance upon its property.

It is well settled that a board of education is a quasi corporation acting for the public as one of the state’s ministerial education agencies “for the organization, administration and control of the public school system of the state.” Cline v. Martin, 94 Ohio St. 420, 426. There is no statute creating liability in tort. There is no such liability at common law. Finch v. Board of Education of Toledo, 30 Ohio St. 37; Board of Education of Cincinnati v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cline v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rose v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kriener v. Turkey Valley Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stein v. Highland Park Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Beifuss v. Westerville Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. West Park Shopping Center, Inc. v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API