Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Hale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 2000No. 99-1396PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The issue in this appeal stice. reserving his objections to jurisdiction and service of process and reserving the right to plead further in his original responsive pleading, the appellee “asserted” these defenses, as required by Ark. R. Civ. P. 12(b). We hold that appellee’s reserving of objections amounted to “asserting” the defenses, and we hereby affirm the trial court’s dismissal of this action.

Appellant, as executrix of the estate of Carrie Floy Rickett, sued appellee on a promissory note. That case was dismissed without prejudice because appellant failed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gailey v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Holliman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Adams v. NationsbankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. David Thomas and Cynthia Parker v. Adam Gray Amanda Cox And Dominique BellesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
  5. Higgins v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API