Legal Opinion

People v. Hanenberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 38,607PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendant reviews his conviction of the felony of receiving stolen property, a lady’s wrist watch, of the value of $55, knowing it to have been stolen. If the value was $50 or less, the offense would be a misdemeanor. Act No. 328, § 535, Pub. Acts 1931. The questions here are upon the proof of value and the indorsement of names upon the information.

It is incumbent upon the people to prove the market value at the time and place of the larceny, People v. Gilbert, 163 Mich. 511 (Ann. Cas. 1912 A, 894), if there is a market value.

The watch was a gift to the owner two years before the theft and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. BlueMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. KoukolMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. TamosaitisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. WilkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. WestmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. ToodleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API