Legal Opinion

Beall v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 1981No. [No. 50, September Term, 1980.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

291 Md. 224 (1981)

434 A.2d 1015

CECELIA M. BEALL

v.

CARLTON G. BEALL

[No. 50, September Term, 1980.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided September 11, 1981.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODOWSKY, JJ.

Steven Rosen, with whom were Willoner, Calabrese & Rosen, P.A. on the brief, for appellant.

J. Frederick Garner, with whom were Lancaster & Garner on the brief, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · ColeCole, J.

SMITH and DIGGES, JJ., dissent. SMITH, J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 236 infra, in which DIGGES, J., concurs.

In this case we are called upon to decide, after a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lang v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Marburg v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Blondell v. TuroverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API