Legal Opinion

Benner v. Cassatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1912No. Appeal, No. 83PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 83, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Pbila. Co., March T., 1911, No. 782, dismissing bill in equity in case of Samuel T. Benner v. Robert K. Cassatt. Bill in equity for an injunction, and for damages.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 83, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Pbila. Co., March T., 1911, No. 782, dismissing bill in equity in case of Samuel T. Benner v. Robert K. Cassatt. Bill in equity for an injunction, and for damages. Audeneied, J., filed the following opinion: The bill prays that the defendant be restrained from maintaining windows in what is alleged to be a party wall between his property and that of the plaintiff, and from continuing to trespass on the plaintiff’s land. It also prays for an award of damages as compensation for the trespass complained of. The trial judge…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s cost on the opinion of Judge Audenried, dismissing exceptions to the adjudication.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neilson v. HummelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Benner v. PollardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. McClernan v. GreenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Yoder v. Trainer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API