Legal Opinion

Pate v. Jack Cornelius Shop

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 30, 1993No. AV92000264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

The record reveals that following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered an order in June 1991, finding that John Pate was injured in the line and scope of his employment with Jack Cornelius Shop d/b/a Crossroads Equipment (Crqssroads). The trial court determined that Pate was permanently and totally disabled and it awarded benefits accordingly. Ultimately, in September 1992, Pate filed a motion seeking to have all payments due from Crossroads paid in a lump sum pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-86. The trial court did not rule on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Swann v. StovallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jack Cornelius Shop v. PateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API