Legal Opinion

Danny Ray Harrell v. The Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1998No. 03S01-9508-CH-00098Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FOR PUBLICATION Filed: September 3, 1996 DANNY RAY HARRELL, ) ) KNOX CHANCERY Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ) HON. H. DAVID CATE, Vs. ) CHANCELLOR ) THE MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) NO. 03-S-01-9508-CH-00098 Defendant-Appellee. ) For Appellant: For Appellee: Rufus W. Beamer, Jr. Arthur G. Seymour, Jr. Knoxville, Tennessee Robert L. Kahn FRANTZ, McCONNELL & SEYMOUR Knoxville, Tennessee OPINION COURT OF APPEALS REVERSED; REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT. ANDERSON, J We granted this appeal to determine whether we should retain "the Distretti…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Botts v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API