McDuffie v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant Solomon McDuffie was convicted of four counts of aggravated robbery. The trial court subsequently vacated one of appellant’s convictions and denied further postconviction relief. On appeal, appellant claims the trial court erred in admitting identification and dog-tracking evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
Around 10:25 p.m. on September 20, 1989, Mian Shoukat, Mohammed Anwar, and Salman Mazhar were returning to their apartment in Minneapolis. As the three men walked toward their home, a car pulled into a driveway in front of them. Two men got…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Wilkie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- Crosby v. MoriartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. StreeperIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- State v. ScharmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Tariq-Madyun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Van Pelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015