Legal Opinion
Dakmak v. Baton Rouge City Police Department
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 2014No. 2012 CA 1850PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTheriot, J.
|2In this case, the defendants appeal a judgment awarding expert witness fees and deposition transcript costs after trial. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This suit arises from an automobile accident which occurred on February 2, 2008, *513between Nelson Dakmak, Sr. and Baton Rouge City Police Department (“BRPD”) Officer Stephen C. Tibbetts. Mr. Dakmak filed suit against BRPD and Officer Tib-betts for his injuries, and upon his death, his children were substituted as plaintiffs and amended the petition to include…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bourgeois v. Heritage Manor of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Welborn v. Ashy Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Northwest Ins. Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Wampold v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. Louisiana Department of TransportationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- McDougald v. St. Francis North Hospital, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Arnaud v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Earl Alphonso v. v. Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Risk Management, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Eaux Holdings L L C v. Scottsdale Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.