Legal Opinion
Kimball, Bennett, Brooslin & Pava v. McGahan
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided June 17, 2003No. 0136PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRup, J.
Janine McGahan (“McGahan”) filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”) alleging discrimination and retaliation by her former employer, Kimball, Bennett, Brooslin and Pava (“Kimball Bennett”). After hearing, the MCAD hearing officer found in McGahan’s favor and awarded damages. The Full Commission affirmed the hearing officer’s decision. Thereafter, Kimball Bennett filed the instant suit seeking, inter alia, a jury trial on McGahan’s claims.2 See Lavelle v. Massachusetts *563Commission Against Discrimination, 426 Mass. 332 (1997).
After jury trial, a verdict…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Walton v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Bruce Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., and Jim SlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mickiewicz v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013