Legal Opinion

Julius v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1970No. 54393PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELBORN, Commissioner.

Action for partition. Trial court sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss at close of all evidence. After her post-judgment motions had been overruled, plaintiff appealed.

The petition alleged that plaintiff Mary Julius and defendant Helen Buckner, on November 10, 1961, each became the owner of an undivided one-half interest in remainder, subject to a life estate in Clarence E. Ellett, in a tract of residential property in the City of St. Louis. The petition alleged that Ellett died on July 6, 1963, and that the land could not be partitioned in kind.

Defendant’s answer…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Murphy v. GabbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Zumwalt v. ForbisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. St. Louis County National Bank v. FielderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. State v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Cooper v. Anschutz Uranium Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Jones v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Cruse v. Clark (In re Clark)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API