Legal Opinion
Duke Engy Trdg & Mkt v. FERC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 21, 2003No. 01-1163Published
1Opinion of the Court
315 F.3d 377
DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND MARKETING, L.L.C., and American Natural Gas Corporation, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation, Intervenor.
No. 01-1163.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued October 11, 2002.
Decided January 21, 2003.
On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Gordon J. Smith argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.
Laura J. Vallance, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Exxon Corporation,petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Municipal Defense Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Duke Energy Trading & Marketing, L.L.C. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003