Legal Opinion

State v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 24, 2003No. 90,865, No. 90,866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

The State of Kansas filed this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s order suppressing evidence resulting from a warrantless search incident to a traffic stop. The evidence resulted in the arrests of Eric Schneider and Zachary Ayers, who were charged with drug-related offenses. We affirm the district court.

Factual and Procedural Overview

On December 16, 2002, Investigator Gary Hanus of the 1-135/ 1-70 Drug Task Force received a phone call from Richard Peppers, an in-store protection specialist at a Salina Target store. Peppers reported that he had observed two white…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. DammSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. State v. McKeownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Twyla Mcelree v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. MalmCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. City of Norton v. WonderlyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API