Fisher/Gordon v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.
In these two consolidated cases, 1 petitioners seek judicial review of decisions by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) denying or deferring their parole release dates. On review, each petitioner filed a motion requesting that this court issue an order allowing appellate counsel to view the confidential sealed information on which the board relied in making its decision. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that each petitioner’s counsel should be allowed to view the confidential sealed information on which the board relied in making its decision.
I. FISHER v. BOARD…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Turner v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Mail Tribune, Inc. v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Fisher/Gordon v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010