Howe Sewing-Machine Co. v. Rosensteel
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
At Law. Scire facias quare execulionem non. Sur rule for judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtAcheson, J.
Conceding that the relationship between the Howe Sewing-machine Company and T. T. Wherry was not that of principal and agent, it still remains to be determined whether the agreement of February 11, 1884, established between them anything more than a personal relation which the death of the latter dissolved. This is the controlling question. The agreement recites that the company has sold to Wherry 100 Howe sewing-machines for $2,500, and received in settlement his 11 specified notes, running from 6 to 16 months; the company stipulating to accept, on or before the maturity of said notes, the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Harlow v. Oregonian Pub. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Bancroft v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969