Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1994No. CR 94-803PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Betty Sue Gray appeals her conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and contends that it was not supported by substantial evidence. There was substantial evidence of her guilt, and we affirm the judgment of conviction.

At the trial in April of 1994, an undercover agent and a confidential informant both testified that appellant sold crack cocaine to the agent in January of 1993. The agent and the informant, in describing the details of their meeting with appellant and purchasing the cocaine, differed in one detail. The confidential informant testified that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Luckey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Plessy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Rawls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Malvin Bynum v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API