Legal Opinion

Boim v. Quranic Literacy Institute

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 2002No. 01-1969, 01-1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge (in chambers).

ON MOTION TO STAY THE MANDATE

This matter is here on the July 10, 2002 motion of the Holy Land Foundation For Relief and Development (“HLF”) to stay the mandate. HLF fashions its motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(d)(2)(A), which provides that a party may move to stay the mandate pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. Under the rule, the motion “must show that the certiorari petition would present a substantial question and that there is good cause for a stay.” Fed. R.App. P. 41(d)(2)(A). In making…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William A. Books and Michael Suetkamp v. City of Elkhart, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Janet Chandler, ph.d., Cross-Appellee v. Cook County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boim v. Quranic Literacy InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API