Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Kaiser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cubiam.

We think that the Special Term properly denied the application of plaintiff for alimony pendente lite since it appears that defendant has been making adequate provision for the maintenance and support of plaintiff. However, she is entitled to a counsel fee to prosecute this action.

*836The order should be modified by directing defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of $750 for counsel fee; $375 to be paid within ten days after service of a copy of the order, and the balance when the case appears on the day calendar for trial, and, as so modified, affirmed, -with twenty dollars costs and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lampert v. LampertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Scheideler v. ScheidelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Walsh v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Amkraut v. Roanoke Garment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API