Legal Opinion

King v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1985No. Nos. 48845, 48844PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Consolidated appeals of husband from the denial of his motion to modify the maintenance provision of a dissolution decree and of wife from the denial of her oral motion for attorney’s fees.

The marriage of the parties was dissolved in 1976 and a settlement agreement was incorporated into the decree of dissolution. The agreement expressly provides “[e]xcept for child support and custody provisions ... none of the provisions or terms of this agreement or of the decree shall hereinafter be changed or modified.” Husband argues incorporation into the decree causes the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Whitenton v. WhitentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Marriage of Orth v. OrthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Davis v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. GodatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Halliday v. BolandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Layden v. LaydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Cody v. PlaceeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Dwyer v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API