Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Cline

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1929No. 3179Published

1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered on trial of an exception or motion to dissolve an attachment, in which the attachment was dissolved, with damages in favor of the defendant, and it is urged that, under the provisions of article 258, Code Prac., which provides that, “if the defendant (in attachment) * * * prove in a summary way, after having given due notice in writing to the adverse party, that the allegations on which the order for attachment had been obtained were false, such attachment shall be dissolved,” the verity of the allegations upon which the attachment was issued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Read v. WareSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  2. Allen, Nugent & Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API