Legal Opinion

Gastelum v. Easiness LP

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 3, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00166Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00166-ADA-BAK 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BE DENIED 13 EASINESS LP, (ECF No. 17). 14 Defendant. 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 16 17 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action against 18 Defendant Easiness LP (“Defendant”). (See ECF No. 1). On September 2, 2017, Plaintiff filed a 19 request for entry of default against Defendant. (ECF No. 17).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Hawaii Carpenters' Trust Funds v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Barnstead Broadcasting Corp. v. Offshore Broadcasting Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API