Legal Opinion

Saliga v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 4, 1994No. 92-01460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FULMER, Judge.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motions to replace his attorney and to withdraw his guilty pleas. We find no error regarding the first issue and, accordingly, affirm that ruling.

As to the denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, we reverse. The transcript of the plea hearing reveals that at no time was Defendant informed that any of the charges against him could result in a minimum mandatory sentence. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(e)(1) requires that, before accepting a guilty plea, the court “shall determine that [the defendant] understands ...…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API