Legal Opinion
Callahan v. Peltier
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The facts stipulated for the purposes of this reservation include the following: The will of Marie L. P. Fournier, late of New London, after making various specific devises and bequests, in paragraph 12th gave, devised and bequeathed the residue of her property to her brother Oscar E. Peltier, and her sister Bertha H. Peltier Callahan, jointly, in trust, they to receive all income therefrom, share and share alike, during the term of the trust. The next paragraph, which is the one involved in this reservation, provided as follows: “Said Trust created under Article 12th to cease and terminate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bartlett v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Robinson v. Noble's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Duffield v. PikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Chase National Bank v. SchleussnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Dorrance v. RaynsfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willis v. HendrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Marshall v. KleinmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Offredi v. HuhlaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- In Re SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Dinan v. PattenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.