Legal Opinion

Layfield v. Roberts

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1991No. 2900022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a post-divorce proceeding involving ordered payment of post-minority support.

The mother filed a petition for contempt and a petition for modification concerning the child support obligation of the father for the benefit of the parties’ younger son. The son is over the age of nineteen, has a learning disability, and is enrolled in college at the University of North Alabama. The father answered and counterclaimed, requesting to be relieved of paying post-minority support. After receiving evidence ore tenus, the trial court entered an order increasing the support…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Brannon v. BrannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte BrewingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broadway v. BroadwayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  2. Dunigan v. BruningCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Tolbert v. TolbertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API