Legal Opinion

Bank of the United States v. RITCHIE

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1834PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

This is an appeal from a decree pronounced by the United States court for the District of Columbia, sitting in chancery, for the county of Washington.

The Bank of the United States and others, alleging themselves to be creditors of Abner Ritchie deceased, instituted this suit in chancery against John T. Ritchie administrator, and one of the heirs of the said Abner, and against John T. Ritchie, Jun. and others, who were the infant heirs of the said Abner, praying that his real estate may be subjected to the payment of the debts due to them, and that so much of the said estate might be sold as…

2Cited by61 opinions

  1. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Buffalo Loan, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. B.L., T. S.D. Co. v. . K.T. M.M.A. Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Warren v. . Union Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API