Legal Opinion
Maizner v. Hawaii, Department of Education
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 1, 2005No. Civil 05-00552 SOM/KSCPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Jeff Maizner asserts claims against Defendants State of Hawaii, Department of Education (“the DOE”), and Robert Ginlack (collectively, “Defendants”). 1 Ma-izner asserts: (1) a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“the ADA”) (Claim 1); (2) a violation of chapter 378 of Hawaii Revised Statutes (Claim 2); (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress (Claim 3); (4) negligent investigation (Claim…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lales v. Wholesale Motors Company.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Hawaii Pacific HealthDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
- Turner v. Hawaii First Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Fernandez v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Jass v. CherryRoad Technologies Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.