Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Carolla
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided October 19, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.
Motions numbered 93 and 95 are hereby consolidated and disposed of simultaneously.
In this action to recover a civil penalty brought under paragraph b of subdivision f of section 692f-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York for obstructing more than one third of the street, defendant Carolla moves to dismiss the complaint as to him for failure to state a cause of action. Defendant’s motion is grounded on the allegations that (1) criminal summonses issued against him and others for the same alleged violations were dismissed; and (2) he was a mere laborer, working for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. . AhearnNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- In Re the Estate of RechtschaffenNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Radke Oil Co. v. Kansas Department of Health & EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- People v. GoldsteinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
- People v. Allied Sanitation, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- People v. Allied Sanitation, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1993