Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cyr v. McDERMOTT'S, INC.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 5, 2010No. 2008-290Published

1Dissent

Reiber, C.J.,

¶ 21. dissenting. This case is an example of the adage: “Exceptional cases must not be permitted to beget bad law.” Downer v. Battles, 103 Vt. 201, 204, 152 A. 805, 806 (1931). Although I am sympathetic to claimant’s position, I cannot agree with the majority’s decision, which discards the language of the statute to avoid exclusion of claimant’s injury. The plain statutory language of 21 V.S.A. § 649 directs that an employee may not recover workers’ compensation benefits when his injury was caused “by or during his or her intoxication.” The majority’s interpretation focuses on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SurdamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Clodgo v. Rentavision, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API