Arnold v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
— The The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.
The evidence is voluminous and conflicting. Appellant testified to facts which, if true, would have exculpated him. The sheriff testifying at a witness upon behalf of the State, said with reference to the appellant: “He had the reputation of being the worst bootlegger in Washington County.” The court then stated to the witness that this was not the proper way to answer the question, whereupon the witness replied: “Yes, I know his…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Robert E. McFarland v. Harold J. Smith, and Lawrence T. Kurlander, Monroe County District Attorney, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Allison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Lera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.