Legal Opinion

Wieberg v. Thompson (In Re Thompson)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 26, 2004No. 19-40363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff Nick Wieberg filed this adversary proceeding to object to the discharge-ability of a deficiency claim in the amount of $53,888. On September 22, 2004, this Court entered judgment in favor of Wie-berg, pursuant to section 523(a)(6) of the Code, and held the debt to be nondis-chargeable. The Thompsons filed a motion to alter or amend that judgment. They make three substantive arguments and three technical arguments. As to the technical arguments, the points are well…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Transouth Financial Corporation of Florida v. Ralph Jennings Johnson, Vera JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. In the Matter of Robert Charles Shelton, Edwin J. Gasaway, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Raymond ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. In Re SirianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re LittleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Ghadimi v. AshaiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. CMEA Title Agency, Inc. v. LittleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. Southern Bancorp South v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API