Legal Opinion

Mims v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1929No. 12112PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for wilful misapplication of bank funds; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We only notice those things necessary to dispose of the case. A number of indictments were returned in which appellant and one Lafon were jointly indicted. One of these forms the basis for the instant prosecution. Upon facts set out and agreed to in connection with the hearing of appellant’s motion for new trial, and upon other parts of the record, we base the following statement of the facts: In one of said cases, but not this one, we infer that the judge, Hon. J. F. Mullally,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summerlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Bomar v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Castles v. BurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Fariss v. Beeville Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Enloe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Blackburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API