Legal Opinion

State v. Beall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1995No. CR 95-401PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The defendant was charged in one information with four felony counts of controlled substance violations. He filed a pretrial motion to suppress all of the evidence seized from him at the time of his arrest. The trial court granted the motion. The State dismissed the charges and attempts to appeal the ruling as an interlocutory appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

The State has no right to appeal other than in those cases authorized by the Constitution of Arkansas and the Rules of Criminal Procedure. State v. Edwards, 310 Ark. 516, 838 S.W.2d 356 (1992). Appeals by the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Spear & BoyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. City of Springfield v. MondaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. State v. BickerstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Burrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. C.W.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. State v. C.W.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. State v. CWSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API