Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Peck

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1980No. 184-416, CA 15771PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in a property damage action after a trial to the court. One assignment of error is raised without any attempt to comply with Rule 25.10, Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure, and will not be considered. Further, we are asked to reverse a judgment because of insufficiency of the evidence, but plaintiffs failed to raise that matter at trial. Baldwin v. Miller, 44 Or App 371, 606 P2d 629 (1980); see also, Travelers Indemn. v. American Ins., 278 Or 193, 199, 563 P2d 684 (1977). Also, we are asked to pass on the credibility of witnesses,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Baldwin v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Wesley v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Ryland v. RylandOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. MareshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API