Legal Opinion

Patel v. Zemski

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 19, 2001No. 01-2398UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

The issue before us is a limited one. The appellant does not challenge the power of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) to detain him. Indeed, appellant, a lawful permanent resident, concedes that the INS has legitimate grounds for detaining some individuals pending removal. The only issue is whether appellant, and aliens in his position, can be mandatorily detained pending a final determination on removal without any opportunity for an individualized determination of the alien’s risk of flight or danger to the community. Ironically,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patel v. ZemskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Wanker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API