Legal Opinion

Raso v. Raso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered March 28, 2000, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated June 22, 2000, which *365denied his motion to vacate the judgment of divorce which was entered upon his default in appearing at trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the divorce judgment which was entered upon his default is appearing at trial. “Although the courts have adopted a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Male J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Baumer v. BaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Molesky v. MoleskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farhadi v. QureshiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Farhadi v. QureshiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API