Legal Opinion

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2005No. 04-AA-282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

The District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (RHC or the Commission) upheld a finding of statutory retaliation by a housing provider against tenant-petitioner Mark S. Miller.1 See D.C.Code § 42-3505.02 (2001). The RHC went on, however, to vacate a fine of $2,090 which the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) had imposed as a sanction because, in the RHC’s view, the ALJ had “failed to make findings of fact or conclusions of law on whether the housing provider acted willfully as is required by the [fine provision] of the [Rental Housing] Act.” Miller now petitions for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Quality Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Webb v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Wilson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API