Legal Opinion

Peters v. Sisson

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to obtain resnbmission of local option questions.

1Opinion of the CourtDevendorf, J.

At the biennial town meeting held with the general election November 6, 1917, the questions specified in section 13 of the Liquor Tax Law were submitted to the electors of the town of New Hartford, Oneida county, N. Y. The vote thereon was as follows: Question No. 1, Yes, 520, No, 633; Question No. 2, Yes, 519, No, 570; Question No. 3, Yes, 591, No, 555; Question No. 4, Yes, 542, No, 611.

If the decision, as expressed by the electors in said figures, remains, no liquor will be sold in the town after October 1, 1918, except by a pharmacist on a physician’s prescription. The petitioner (a hotel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. In re the Re-submission to the Electors of the Town of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of WorkhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In re Peters v. SissonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API