Legal Opinion

Dunrite Auto Body & Motor Works, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 25, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed without costs and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied.

*441Plaintiff, a repair shop, sued to recover from defendant insurer in connection with its repair of the car owned by defendant’s insured, Stephen Rahilly, whose policy included collision insurance coverage. Plaintiff contested the propriety of defendant’s allowance of only $30 as the hourly rate for repair services instead of the $40 rate set forth in plaintiff’s bill to Rahilly, resulting in a shortfall of $565. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Cohen v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunrite Auto Body & Motors, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSuffolk County District Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API