Legal Opinion
State v. Nickel
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 2000No. 25132, 25133Published
1Opinion of the Court
7 P.3d 219 (2000)
134 Idaho 610
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James Otto NICKEL, Defendant-Respondent.
Nos. 25132, 25133.
Supreme Court of Idaho. Boise, January 2000 Term.
August 8, 2000.
Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, Boise, for appellant. Alison A. Stieglitz argued.
Wm. J. Brauner, P.A., Caldwell, for respondent. Timothy William Spencer argued.
KIDWELL, Justice.
The State of Idaho appeals from the district court's order granting defendant James Nickel's motion to suppress evidence of controlled substances recovered from his vehicle. We reverse.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Canyon…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.