Legal Opinion

State v. Medrano

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 12, 1995No. 13830-5-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

Guillermo Medrano was charged with residential burglary. Residential burglary requires proof of, among other things, intent. Medrano admits burglarizing the home, but claims a combination of drugs and alcohol diminished his capacity and prevented him from forming the necessary intent to commit the crime. During voir dire, the State exercised one of its peremptory challenges and struck an African-American juror, who was a former public health nurse with experience with people high on drugs and alcohol as part of her job. Medrano objected. The State explained that the challenge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. RobtoyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. MailWashington Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State Of Washington v. Marcus Deandre WillisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API