Legal Opinion

Czarobski v. Lata

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 18, 2007No. 1-06-1537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

In 2005, plaintiffs, Edward and Annette Czarobski, filed suit against defendants, Grzegorz and Anna Lata, after they discovered that the property taxes due on the home they purchased from defendants were substantially more than the credit they received at closing. The trial court dismissed the case pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 2004)) on the basis that the merger doctrine applied. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the merger doctrine did not apply because they showed that a mutual mistake of fact occurred. For the foregoing reasons, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lenzi v. MorkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Daniels v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hagenbuch v. ChapinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Czarobski v. LataIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. IordanovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. Coleman v. AKPAKPANAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Czarobski v. LataIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API