Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., and Sambar Properties, Inc. v. The City of Ann Arbor George W. Gardner and G. M. Scofield

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1981No. 79-1338Published

1DissentKeith, Circuit Judge

In a carefully considered and well-written opinion, Judge Julian Cook concluded that the plaintiff clearly waived any First Amendment rights it may have had to use the name “Sambo’s” at its Ann Arbor restaurant. I think that the district court is absolutely correct. I find my colleagues’ views to the contrary to be untenable. I respectfully dissent.

I

Judge Celebrezze and Judge Merritt agree that the name “Sambo’s” is protected by the First Amendment. They give different reasons, however, for their conclusion that the plaintiff waived any rights it may have had to use the name “Sambo’s.” Judge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API