Legal Opinion

Salcinger v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Trial Term of the City Court of the city of New York setting aside the verdict of a jury in plaintiff’s favor.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The action is for personal injuries. The jury found for the plaintiff in the sum of $550. The *180defendant moved to set aside said verdict, and the court granted the motion, on the ground that the verdict was based upon insufficient evidence and was against the weight of evidence. From the order setting aside the said verdict, plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff’s testimony shows that, on August 24, 1903, he was driving a wagon from Ludlow street up Second avenue to Twelfth street. He was then on the'right hand side of Second avenue, going north, and he turned to cross said avenue in order to go…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swartout v. WillinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metzler v. FarberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Deane v. StegherrCity of New York Municipal Court · 1916
  4. Schwartz v. JolineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API