Legal Opinion

Pruet v. Dugger-Holmes & Associates

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 2, 1964No. 1 Div. 160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit by appellant in the circuit court of Mobile County against appellee to recover on an indemnity agreement. The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, rendered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals to review the action of the trial court.

Succinctly stated by appellant, it appears that by letter dated April 12, 1961, Zach Brooks Drilling Company, a partnership composed of Chesley Pruet and Edward L. Erickson, entered into an agreement with defendant whereby the drilling company agreed to drill the Roy W. Johnson #1 well for defendant as a turnkey job. As a part of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Vandiver & Co. v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Russell v. IrbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  4. Givens v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Prewitt v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Titan Indem. Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. St. Paul Insurance Companies, a Corporation v. Talladega Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. City of Montgomery v. JYD Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. American & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Colonial Mortgage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. PRICE-WILLIAMS ASSOC. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API