Hammond v. State

Blackburn, Judge.

Ronald Hammond appeals from his conviction for criminal trespass following a bench trial. Hammond contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. He also contends that the trial court erred (1) by finding the criminal trespass statute could bar entry on property for the purpose of sleeping and (2) by excluding certain witness testimony. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and [Hammond] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate…