Legal Opinion
People v. Shaw
New York Mills Village Court
Decided December 28, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Maynard T. Roman, J.
The defendant has moved to suppress the results of a breathalyzer test. The evidence at the suppression hearing revealed that the defendant was involved in an automobile accident on October 1,1982. After arriving on the scene, the police chief observed the defendant’s behavior and placed him under arrest for driving while intoxicated. (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3].)
Following the arrest, the officer read a “DWI warning card” to the defendant which stated, inter alla, that refusal to submit to the chemical test could result in revocation of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985